Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
PLoS One ; 16(2): e0246302, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1085153

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Two automatable in-house protocols for high-troughput RNA extraction from nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 detection have been evaluated. METHODS: One hundred forty one SARS-CoV-2 positive samples were collected during a period of 10-days. In-house protocols were based on extraction with magnetic beads and designed to be used with either the Opentrons OT-2 (OT-2in-house) liquid handling robot or the MagMAXTM Express-96 system (MMin-house). Both protocols were tested in parallel with a commercial kit that uses the MagMAXTM system (MMkit). Nucleic acid extraction efficiencies were calculated from a SARS-CoV-2 DNA positive control. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between both in-house protocols and the commercial kit in their performance to detect positive samples. The MMkit was the most efficient although the MMin-house presented, in average, lower Cts than the other two. In-house protocols allowed to save between 350€ and 400€ for every 96 extracted samples compared to the commercial kit. CONCLUSION: The protocols described harness the use of easily available reagents and an open-source liquid handling system and are suitable for SARS-CoV-2 detection in high throughput facilities.


Subject(s)
Automation, Laboratory/methods , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/methods , RNA, Viral/standards , Automation, Laboratory/economics , Automation, Laboratory/standards , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/economics , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/standards , Costs and Cost Analysis , Humans , RNA, Viral/chemistry , RNA, Viral/genetics , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/economics , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/standards , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL